Not anymore, folks. That’s not how Trump rolls. Traditions and arrogant assumptions are getting rejected
all over the world. The “little people” have stood up to the British
elites, the American media (and the Democratic Party). Even the Italians
rejected centralized governance and European Union austerity. It’s a new morning in the world.
So, traditions are falling to the wayside …
Another “tradition” should be put away, as well: the
global(ist) obsession with “gay marriage.”And Taiwan, incidentally enough, is the next battle
ground. Taiwan’s new President, a member of the island
nation’s loyal opposition, has pledged a commitment to helping the poor, the
disadvantaged. Like a number of left-leaning politicos, she is also reaching
out to the “LGBT” movement. Oh brother. I have great hopes for the Asian countries, just as
I have witnessed the Latin American nations resist the homosexual agenda and
the gender-bending ideologies of anti-Western snobs. To their credit, the Taiwanese people elected a
popular leader to their Presidency, who resists a strong alliance with Beijing.
She also bested another attempt by President Barack Obama to influence a
foreign election for his limited ambitions. Besides, President Tsai’s ascension
is the latest step in a trend away from the autocratic Kuomintang, which has
held decades-long one-party rule in Taiwan, since the 1940s, when the
Nationalists fled China following World War II. Still, she has a distinctly “progressive” platform,
to be sure. Flag of TaiwanI learned a great deal about her party (The
Democratic Progressive Party) and their history at a local celebration held in
Monterey Park, California. The event took place on Veterans Day, 2016—three
days after Donald Trump’s historic and unprecedented win against Hillary
Clinton, defeating the media, political elites of both parties, plus the
corporatist, globalist interests from Washington to Brussels. The Democratic Progressive Party of Taiwan had sent
delegates to the United States. They were learning about the electoral and
political systems of the United States. Two Congressman attended—Judy Chu of
Pasadena, and Ed Royce of Brea. Local officials informed me that Republican
efforts have committed to working with the DPP to bring them more to the
political center. The invitation from a DPP ambassador was well-appreciated
(they wanted to learn about local as well as national politics). I could not turn down the opportunity. So, my knowledge of Taiwan—the nation’s culture and
politics—has grown. Then surprise, surprise: one month later, I received
an email from a correspondent at Taiwan’s Central News Agency in Los Angeles.
His request was abrupt yet professional:The
confrontation for gay marriage in Taiwan is becoming one of the major causes of
the instability of Taiwanese society. I
do not know how you think about those who live in Taiwan after you read all
stories above. For
me, it is too naive for Taiwanese to understand how gay marriage may hurt Taiwanese
society seriously. In
view of this, I would like to write a report to introduce impacts and effects
of gay marriage to Taiwanese after gay marriage was legalized for several years
in California. Could
you please help me? All
I need your help is offer me some actual and real examples, stories or
incidents as to impacts and effects of gay marriage over California, please. I
will be very grateful if you would like to help me for my article as soon as
you can. I
was surprised that a member of the press would want to know the effects of “gay
marriage” and report on the consequences for the readership in the home
country. Most
media types want to promote the destruction of family as a net positive. First,
I provided a litany of clear talking points, however politically incorrect they
may be:’
1. Homosexuality is
destructive.
2. It is neither genetic
nor an innate characteristic of human beings: a very inconvenient truth for the
Left.
3. Homosexuality and
transgenderism are not civil or natural rights, but behaviors.
4. Marriage—by design,
biological recognition, as well as societal and civil preference—must remain for one man and one woman.
5. Gay marriage is not
progressive, but regressive. Ancient Romans and Greeks engaged in similar
“gay marriages”, to the utter destruction of the Ancient Western
world. Click
here.
The health factors cannot
be ignored. Los
Angeles County alone (where I live) has suffered unprecedented outbreaks of severe venereal diseases, which have particularly afflicted gay and bi-sexual men.
I documented the
psychological and physical risks associated with homosexual conduct (freely
acknowledged by homosexuals themselves), all detailed in the liberal-leaning LA Weekly.
(Click
here and here
for more information).
I then related the battle
which Californians across the state, from the Christians colleges to the local
churches, to stop SB 1146, a bill which in its original form would have shut
down Christian colleges and destroyed religious liberty. The overwhelming threats posed by gay marriage or any celebration
of the gay agenda are all too real, and no country should undermine its
essential civil or biological structure all in the name of “social progress.” I emailed him MassResistance’s documentary
“What Gay
Marriage Did to Massachusetts.” The Taiwanese need to see the entire
consequences of gay marriage. I also emailed a version of the
documentary in Chinese.
Pro-life, pro-family
forces have halted this destructive movement in other countries. Let us hope
and pray that the free people of Taiwan will embrace true democratic progress, shout
“Shi!” (“Yes!”) to life and liberty and reject gay marriage in their country.
