Torrance, CA |
I have spoken with individual members of the city council, and asked them why they don't cut or turn down spending on environmental, or green projects.
One councilmember told me that cutting $40,000 here or $20,000 there would not save the city much money, and would contribute very little toward repairing the city's broken-down infrastructure.
When totaling up the following costs on mass transit, "going green" projects, or other investments, one finds a considerable amount of money.
Living Wise (40K)
I had asked about this item, which provided kits and training to middle school students on conservation. The mayor reported to me that this measure contributed successfully to water reduction. Still, the question does arise: why is the city council spending money on this program? I looked at the materials in the Living Wise kits, and found that many of the questions have little or nothing to with academic training. Why are these books providing all these questions about
Torrance, CA — scene from Madrona Marsh |
Alternative Fuel Replacement Buses (2.2Million)
That's a lot for gas. Who knows how much more it will be with the rising fuel costs in the state.
One city councilmember explained: "We have to learn to pick our fights."
On the other hand, I think it's time for the city to start picking fights on certain fronts.
I am hearing so much griping and complaining about this measure. Clint Paulson explained to one audience that the street sweeping does nothing to create clean streets or a cleaner environment. Evidence like this would more likely persuade councilmembers to rethink this program, if individual residents and homeowners find it so detestable.
With all the lawns getting torn out all over Torrance, I see the growing impact of these harsh restrictions. When will state leaders start making Water Wise decisions of their own?
More bike lanes add costs? I was not aware of that. The greater concern rests on whether these bike lanes will make it harder for individual drivers to travel throughout as well as out of the city. Los Angeles was toying with the idea of narrowing main thoroughfare Gaffey street in San Pedro. The public responses was less than enthusiastic, to put it mildly.
CCA is dead on arrival. A number of sources within the city as well as concerned citizens have affirmed that this overblown attempt at alternative energy use is DOA. Councilman Tim Goodrich (who has pushing this pet project)
Who is paying for this? What about the rest of us in the city? Why don't we get a bonus or a perk if we don't rideshare?
More good news: this program has been suspended.
Final Comments.
Many of these programs seem irrelevant or inappropriate to the "Back to Basics" agenda better pursued by Torrance City Council.
The money for these projects and programs could have contributed to more security on our streets. How about the fireworks show? Most importantly of all – let's fix the streets in this town.
Now that's an environmental quality investment I would like to see the city discuss and implement!