A pro-family contact got in touch with me following our victory in getting the Hong Kong Gay Pride parade cancelled this past weekend.
![]("https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-pW5z6Ux6DoE/XdLh4AdR5yI/AAAAAAABs8o/CAeqeQlvAAgA6mbabVZWVHaFFee6ffBcACLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/11.16.19%2BGay%2BScene%2BHong%2BKong%2BTwo.PNG")
Sadly, Hong Kong still permitted a pro-gay assembly. Thankfully, it was poorly attended, with about 1,000 people showing up. It was very bad, too–not just morally, but artistically (More on that later).
My contact was surprised to learn that the pro-LGBT lobby is working hand-in-hand with the pro-democracy movement and protesters.
I showed him a few articles, but let me outline for everyone that the young face of the Hong Kong Pro-Democracy movement openly embraced the LGBT Agenda.
Time Magazine wrote a horrific article promoting this young activist, while denigrating his father, who is the most vocal and well-connected pro-family activist in Hong Kong.
The young activist's name? Joshua Wong.
![]("https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-fwmzYxDB-X4/XdLbp84zjII/AAAAAAABs8Q/wJ4RYuEArjQ8Qwqhh2cKTCN2EHtj9l_xgCLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/Joshua%2BWong%2BTwitter%2BProfile.PNG")
As early as 2016, Time Magazine published the following about Joshua Wong:
"Homophobic" has turned into a nonsensical smear. Such a headline shows how far Time Magazine has fallen in terms of journalistic quality. Of course, the lack of ideological rigor displayed by Joshua Wong and fellow democracy activists is even more disconcerting.
The article continues:
Wong, has distanced himself from his father Roger Wong, who has launched an
online campaign against an initiative … to promote awareness of LGBT
rights.
…
democracy protests, known as the Umbrella Revolution, when he was just shy of
his 18th birthday, appearing on the cover of TIME. He has since become a
globe-trotting activist, meeting members of U.S. Congress and rallying Asia’s
youth to demand more democratic governance.
party, Demosistō, which on its website calls for passage of an
antidiscrimination law, recognition of same-sex unions and legal protections
for transgender people. The party has pushed for Hong Kong to enact a law
called the Sexual Orientation Discrimination Ordinance (SODO), which, if
passed, would be a milestone for the semiautonomous Chinese city, as it
presently offers no explicit protections for sexual minorities.
![]("https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Kp2fD6X90v8/XdLdGfz2FZI/AAAAAAABs8c/0pBYhU72nC8zh2zsk8dephaQ5a7oCyN-wCLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/Demosisto%2BFront%2BPage.PNG") |
| Notice Joshua on the left. |
Same-sex unions, Legal protections of transgenderism, and a non-discrimination ordinance for so-called sexual minorities. This is pretty disturbing stuff. In fact, the Democratic Majority pushed a similar set of policies in the "Equality Act", which would have gutted the Civil Rights Act of 1964, turning destructive behaviors into protected classes. The clash between individual liberties and religious sentiment against LGBT propaganda would have been harsh and detrimental to … the general citizenry which value freedom of speech, religion, assembly, and all the rest.
Hong Kong. Through direct action, popular referenda, and non-violent means, we
push for the city’s political and economic autonomy from the oppression of the
Communist Party of China (CPC) and capitalist hegemony.
Consider his alliance with the pro-LGBT Russian punk bad, which has been causing all kinds of unnecessary, immoral uproars in their own country:
Two members of feminist Russian punk band @pussyrrriot will attend the public opening, along with democracy activist Joshua Wong and local political artist Sampson Wong. All will join a special Q&A on free expression, art, politics and LGBT rights. https://t.co/BFruvNprpN pic.twitter.com/jgBmhFbkim— Joshua Wong 黃之鋒 (@joshuawongcf) November 1, 2018
LGBT rights? Really? Has Joshua Wong been paying attention to what has happened to law-abiding citizens in the United Kingdom, Canada, and even some parts of the United States?
How can Joshua claim to support freedom, democracy, and the undermining of communism, while pushing the cultural Marxist folly of LGBT privileges?
Here's another article showcasing Joshua's support for sexual perversion, especially in conflict with his pro-family father:
legislation of a sexual orientation discrimination law on Wednesday after his
father spoke out against LGBTQ equality in a magazine interview.
Family School Sexual Orientation Discrimination Ordinance Concern Group. He was
profiled by Next Magazine on Wednesday, speaking against the introduction of
protections for the LGBTQ community.
which cited and shared the magazine article: “I support LGBTQ equality, and I
support the legislation of a Sexual Orientation Discrimination Ordinance. I
understand very clearly what law is being discussed. It is not up to other
people to judge whether I have understood it or thought it through,” Wong
wrote.
![]("https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-LQq5zM81Pcw/XdLx4LF7ZlI/AAAAAAABs9M/I6vmDgef458z2VHzaV8rCBUnpj086nWCgCLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/LGBT%2Btyranny.png")
organise openly into a powerful lobby, and it thus became a mere platform from
which further demands were launched. Next followed demands for equality, in
which homosexuality was officially placed on the same moral level as standard
forms of sexuality, and dismissal of identified homosexuals from sensitive positions, for instance in schools,
children’s homes, etc., became progressively more difficult.
in turn by demands not merely for equality but privilege: the appointment, for
instance, of homosexual quotas in local government, the excision from school
textbooks and curricula, and university courses, passages or books or authors
they found objectionable, special rights to proselytise, and not least the
privilege of special programmes to put forward their views – including the
elimination of the remaining legal constraints – on radio and television.:
![]("https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-V2i8Dv4E7_g/XdLxOCacEyI/AAAAAAABs9E/016S741Pz80GlThhDulluINx_E-_U-ytgCLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/joshua-wong-butcher-of-hongkong2.jpg")