The California Democratic Party: The Ghost of Confederates Past

Republican Donald Trump is our new President. Barring any
shenanigans from the Electoral College, 306 electors will have cast their
ballots for a pro-American, pro-business, anti-globalist conservative dedicated
to protecting our freedoms.

Not everyone in the Union is happy. Democratic strongholds
have vowed to resist the Trump Administration at every turn. California and its
supermajority Democratic hegemony are particularly dedicated to the proposition
that the liberal elites know better and should not have to answer to the vox
populi of Middle America, who believe that all men are created equal and that
the government should be limited.

Governor Jerry Brown has sworn to build a wall around
California. Janice Hahn of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors has
advocated the same, all in the name of protecting the illegal aliens within the
state. The Democratic legislature’s two leaders have vowed to fight the federal
government at every step. The faint hint of secession hangs in the air, too.
California liberals have lined up initiatives so that voters can decide if they
want to leave the United States or not. A #Calexit lingers on the horizon, and
there’s enough Silicon Valley money to advance the proposal to a vote.

What a bunch of pansies. After the election of the first
Republican President in 1860. the South Carolina (Democratic) legislature  disdained a national plebiscite—they simply
drafted a resolution and announced to the federal government: “We’re leaving!”
Ten states followed. Then followed the Civil War. After five years of
bloodshed, Democratic policies failed, not just at the ballot box but in fields
of battle all over the country.

Indeed, the California Democratic Party of today is
resurrecting the same arrogant, defiant, yet dying spirit of the Ante-Bellum
Southern Democratic secessionists. They are the weaker, fainter vestiges of a
dying Confederacy, a state unto itself convinced of their own intelligence,
disdainful of federal authority and constitutional principles. Even though
California’s Democrats recently banned displays of the Confederate flag on
state property, thy spirit of modern slavery, aka socialism, is strong with
them.

And the parallels are more striking than that!

The Democratic Party was the party of slavery and secession.
Rich plantation owners refused to give up their “peculiar institution”, which
had guaranteed them free labor, cheap products, and slanted trade deals in
international markets. Today, the Democratic Party colludes with Big Business
to welcome millions of illegal aliens into the country for cheap labor. The
California Democratic Par’s other ally, Big Labor, forces workers into
syndicates to take their money and expand the unions’  power. That sounds like a lighter form of
slavery to me. Both special interests uphold and fund the California Democratic
Party today.

How did the Democratic Party of 1860 intend to solidify its
power? They engaged in voter fraud on a massive scale. Throughout the Southern
states, not one ballot listed Abraham Lincoln as a potential presidential
candidate. Today, in dominant Democratic regions like the inner cities, voting
machines automatically turn Republican votes into Democratic ones. Dead people
vote, too!  And like the political
machines which followed the Civil War, Democrats depend on buying votes with
other people’s money, whether for graft or gain, through subsidies or welfare.
Today, California is the welfare capital of the United States, welcoming one
third of the country’s public assistance dependents.

Malapportionment—in which House Districts represent
fewer  people than designated –guaranteed
a set number of unaccountable federal representatives to enrich the Ante-Bellum
Democracy. Since slaves counted as 3/5 of a person for representation, Southern
states maintained a stable number of representatives, even though the same
individuals who counted could not vote. Today, Democrats count on the surging
population of illegal aliens to buttress their numbers and increase their
unjust hegemony in the federal government. A recent case before the Supreme
Court could have determine whether allocation of House reps and electoral votes
should depend on the actual population in district, or the number of lawfully
designated voters. If apportionment of House Seats depended on actually voters
(living and legal), Democratic numbers would drift below 100 seats.

Unreal!

Let’s not forget that the Democracy of the 1860s was an
elitist fringe dedicated to protecting the limited interests of Big Business at
the expense of the common man. Before the Civil War, they lined up their votes
to protect plantation owners—who screamed the loudest and beat up opponents.

Democrats then and now have not changed on other key issues.
The rule of law means nothing to them. The rule of sentiment and of the “landed
gentry” makes all the difference. He who has the gold makes the rules, not the
other way around. Constitutional niceties are meant to be ignored. They had
their social justice warriors, too, who attacked anyone who disagreed with them
(recall South Carolina representative Preston Brooks who savagely thrashed
free-soiler US Senator Charles Sumner of Massachusetts with a cane.)

Democrats then and now relied on racism and division to
consolidate power, and they depended on an uneducated class of adherents to
further their agendas. After all, Southerners ensured that black slaves could
neither read nor write. Today, in Democratically-dominated inner cities all
over the country, residents not only cannot find jobs or opportunity, they are
systematically denied a proper education to take advantage of any
opportunities—if any of them were made available.

Now for the good news: The Democracy is at its lowest ebb
since the Republicans freed the slaves, and more voters are fleeing the modern
day Democratic plantation. The California Democracy cannot stand against
liberty, nor stand in the doorway preventing the next generation from learning
the truth about this country’s grand history and future.

The temper tantrums of the café latte-sipping California
elites will be but a whimper compared to the guns fired on the fields of
Gettysburg a century and a half ago. And indeed this country will witness a new
birth of freedom, and that “government of the people, by the people, for the
people, shall not perish from the earth.”