Regarding homosexuality and other sexual perversions, the Laws of Nature and Nature's God had already been informed to
us long ago through God's Word:
us long ago through God's Word:
26For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for
even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27And
likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned
in their lust one toward another(Romans 1:26-27)
even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27And
likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned
in their lust one toward another(Romans 1:26-27)
Notice that Paul the Apostle writes to the Romans about "natural affection". Here, he is indicating that God's design for each human being, their default natural position
de naturis (literally, "from birth") is that a
man is designed for sexual relations with a woman, and a woman is designed for
sexual relations with a man.
de naturis (literally, "from birth") is that a
man is designed for sexual relations with a woman, and a woman is designed for
sexual relations with a man.
Indeed, human beings are born for sexual relations with the
opposite sex, not for "vile affections" with the same sex.
opposite sex, not for "vile affections" with the same sex.
Human science and scholarship is always lagging behind God's
revelation, but eventually man does arrive at understanding what God had already
made plain to the world through revelation in His Word.
revelation, but eventually man does arrive at understanding what God had already
made plain to the world through revelation in His Word.
"The largest study to date on the genetic basis of sexuality
has revealed five spots on the human genome that are linked to same-sex sexual
behaviour — but none of the markers are reliable enough to predict someone’s
sexuality.
has revealed five spots on the human genome that are linked to same-sex sexual
behaviour — but none of the markers are reliable enough to predict someone’s
sexuality.
"The findings, which are published on 29 August in Science
and based on the genomes of nearly 500,000 people, shore up the results of
earlier, smaller studies and confirm the suspicions of many scientists: while
sexual preferences have a genetic component, no single gene has a large effect
on sexual behaviours.
and based on the genomes of nearly 500,000 people, shore up the results of
earlier, smaller studies and confirm the suspicions of many scientists: while
sexual preferences have a genetic component, no single gene has a large effect
on sexual behaviours.
“There is no ‘gay gene’,” says lead study author Andrea Ganna, a
geneticist at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard in Cambridge,
Massachusetts."
geneticist at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard in Cambridge,
Massachusetts."
As both the sacred and now finally the secular sources declare that
homosexuality is neither genetic nor natural, therefore I share with every
MassResistance member and supporter:
homosexuality is neither genetic nor natural, therefore I share with every
MassResistance member and supporter:
Please present this information to every person you can every chance you get.
If there was needed any evidence to confirm to the general public that which we
have known since the beginning, this comprehensive summary proves it.
have known since the beginning, this comprehensive summary proves it.
!["Image]("https://www.csmedia1.com/firststone.org/no-gay-gene-9-2019-rotator.jpg")
There is no gay gene.
People are not born gay.
There is no scientific basis for recognizing homosexuality as an
immutable characteristic.
Because it's clearly unnatural, in that individuals are not born "that way," we can properly assert that
immutable characteristic.
Because it's clearly unnatural, in that individuals are not born "that way," we can properly assert that
homosexual behavior violates the Laws of Nature and Nature's God.
The United States Constitution recognizes the Laws of Nature through the reference "law of nations", which is found in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 10.
James Wilson, an established legal scholar who signed the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution, asserted the following regarding the law of nations and its connection with the laws of nature:
"The law of nature, when applied to states or political societies, receives a new name, that of the law of nations." (James Wilson, Of the Law of Nations, Lectures on Law)
The United States Constitution recognizes the Laws of Nature through the reference "law of nations", which is found in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 10.
James Wilson, an established legal scholar who signed the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution, asserted the following regarding the law of nations and its connection with the laws of nature:
"The law of nature, when applied to states or political societies, receives a new name, that of the law of nations." (James Wilson, Of the Law of Nations, Lectures on Law)
The United States Supreme Court undermined the rule of law in
imposing false marriage, based on the false premise that homosexual
behavior is another static status, like ethnicity or sex. The United States Constitution enshrines protection for the Laws of Nature and Nature's God. The Supreme Court had no right to undermine the fundamental laws of nature in order to provide another benefit, or another right to sodomy, and furthermore to undermine and redefine marriage outside of its natural dimensions: one man and one woman.
The Supreme Court of the United States must revist Lawrence v. Texas and Obergfell v. Hodges. Those rulings are in flagrant violation of the United States Constitution, and they must be overturned.
imposing false marriage, based on the false premise that homosexual
behavior is another static status, like ethnicity or sex. The United States Constitution enshrines protection for the Laws of Nature and Nature's God. The Supreme Court had no right to undermine the fundamental laws of nature in order to provide another benefit, or another right to sodomy, and furthermore to undermine and redefine marriage outside of its natural dimensions: one man and one woman.
The Supreme Court of the United States must revist Lawrence v. Texas and Obergfell v. Hodges. Those rulings are in flagrant violation of the United States Constitution, and they must be overturned.
Furthermore, President Donald J. Trump should abandon any further efforts to support
decriminalization of homosexualty, a behavior which is naturally destructive and in violation of
the laws of nature.
decriminalization of homosexualty, a behavior which is naturally destructive and in violation of
the laws of nature.