"It's better to have dictatorship like ghadafi than to have hundred fools in politics." — quote from "YouTube"
Moammar Gadhafi killed his own people.
He is a megalomaniac who has skirted responsibility for his abject tyranny these last forty years.
After bombing a discothèque in Berlin 1986, President Ronald Reagan bombed Libya with airstrikes.
In 1988, Gadhafi instigated the Lockerbie Bombing of Pan-Am 187.
People dying, nations terrified and enraged, another culture of Arabs enslaved to a fashion-frustrated fool made dangerous by his petty global aspirations — Gadhafi was, is, and soon no longer will be an evil dictator, a disgrace to government, leadership, and humanity.
In contrast, the "hundred fools in politics", whether the elected assemblies of Senate, House of Representatives, and Executive necessarily clash and mitigate their folly in the American system of checks and balances.
Unlike the monarchies, dictatorships, and tyrannies across the centuries, the United States Framework of Government, as outlined in the United States Constitution, expressly factors in the innate selfishness, folly, and depravity of human nature, forcibly frustrating its excesses.
If I had my pick, I would go with the "one hundred" fools constrained by Limited Government, divided by competing interests, and ultimately elected by the people, the states, and the electors.