In the late 1980s, the LGBT movement introduced the subtle
but false argument that homosexuals were “born that way.”  Today, they are forcing their agenda on us
with relentless militancy. If anyone speaks out against these perverse
behaviors, they are met with condemnation, de-platforming on social media,
termination from their jobs, or even jail time. 
The movement has become serious threat to a free country and the natural
order.
Liberal and progressive politicians embrace this
tyranny.  But where are the conservatives
to “out” this massive problem?  Sadly,
so-called conservatives have tried their best to avoid or have capitulated to
this agenda.  Worst of all, conservative
media leaders have remained silent on this sinister threat to freedom of speech
and thought. Rather than rushing into the fight, they are hiding in the bushes.
More specifically, conservative leading lights like the
editors of National Review, Sean
Hannity, Ann Coulter, and Laura Ingraham consistently refused to address the
LGBT assault on Americans’ health, freedom, and culture.  These pundits will not even report on, let
alone challenge, the horrific “Equality
Act
,” which marks a turning point of the LGBT Agenda: the culmination of
the tyrannical thrust of this movement at the expense of the natural rights of
all.
Why are these conservative media stars afraid to speak out
against the LGBT movement?  After all,
free expression has never been easier. 
Competitive conservative journalism is on the rise, while the pro-gay
mainstream media is in decline.  Sadly,
aside from LifeSiteNews and some
other Christian media sources, most pro-family and conservative media
organizations refuse to confront the radical, abusive, and tyrannical LGBT
agenda.  Drudge Report and The Gateway
Pundit
even portray the LGBT movement as laudable.
Dennis Prager, one of the most prominent conservative
thinkers is no better.  His PragerU videos have educated millions of
people on conservative issues, but his record on exposing the LGBT Agenda is
terrible. Prager has produced videos on transgender movement’s threat to free
speech (“Preferred
Pronouns or Prison
) and the importance of biological sex
differences
(“Sex Matters”).  But he refuses to condemn the LGBT “rights”
movement, especially the health
hazards of homosexuality
and 
transgenderism.
In fact, on homosexuality PragerU has become quite
accommodating.  In one video, “I'm
Gay…Conservative…So What?
,” PragerU
features Guy Benson (editor of Townhall.com),
who declares, “I am Christian, conservative, and gay.”  The video title itself is a total lie.
Christian doctrine—and nature itself!—reject homosexuality.
Conservatism is defined by defending the essential
institutions of natural marriage and family, which homosexuality by definition
opposes.  The idea of “gay marriage” is
another falsehood, and conservatives should reject any capitulation to that
idea and the rest of the LGBT alphabet. 
And yet another PragerU video addressing homosexuality, "Are
Conservatives Anti-Gay
?," bends over backward to try and prove that
conservatives are not “anti-gay” or “homophobic” (employing the loaded language
of the left). The video even advocates “decriminalizing homosexuality
worldwide” through the U.N.
'
Then there’s Ben Shapiro, who refuses to confront the lies
of LGBT “identity” politics.  His last
column addressed this problem
over four years ago.  Today, he retreats to arguments
that children are better off with a mother and a father.  He doesn’t address homosexuality itself.  He avoids any discussion of its impact on
society.  Recently, both Shapiro
and The Federalist fired a contributing
writer because she denounced homosexuality. 
(Fortunately, that writer has returned to The Federalist, but there is no word that Shapiro has welcomed her
back.)
What about Rush Limbaugh? 
A fearless firebrand on family issues in the early 1990s, Limbaugh
rushes away from discussing the LGBT Agenda today.  Conservative, populist-leaning writers like
Victor Davis Hanson, Pat Buchanan, and Tucker Carlson won’t say anything.  The editors of National Review are in full retreat.  Alternative conservative media types like
Mike Dice, Jack Posobiec, and Stefan Molyneux refuse to confront the issue.
Even Paul Joseph Watson, one of the most confrontation and inflammatory
commentators on social media, has all but caved to the LGBT agenda.  He even makes open appeals to “the gays”
because of the militant rise of Islam in the United Kingdom. 



Why should these pundits care?  There are fundamental dangers embedded in the
LGBT Agenda:  the massive health
problems, the moral concerns, the psychological issues associated with these
behaviors.  As for the live-and-let-live
libertarians, they forget that a free-market economy cannot flourish without a
stable society.  Homosexuality,
transgenderism, and other paraphilias (sexual deviance) undermine the basic
fabric of our culture, and conservatives are supposed to be protecting—read, conserving!—our culture.  As for the behaviors themselves, they can
lead to high incidences
of disease, dysfunction, and death
, along with (for transgenders)
infertility.
The conservative movement should not be kowtowing to LGBT
identity politics.  Instead of running
away, conservative media must stand up to the LGBT monolith and call out its
lies.  Whatever is holding back the
conservative and pro-family media – fear of being labeled a bigot, fear of
being blacklisted on social media, fear of losing corporate sponsors – this
cowardice is hastening the demise of our country.  The LGBT juggernaut is not stopping, because
it’s a key weapon in the Left’s totalitarian assault.
So far, MassResistance has been the only international
organization to denounce the LGBT Agenda in full, and today we are denouncing
these conservative media leaders’ silence on these issues.
It’s time for them to discuss, debate, and establish some
inconvenient truths:
·        
People are not
born gay.
·        
People are not
born in the wrong body.
·        
It is not
OK to be “gay.”
·        
Homosexual and transgenderism are mental
disorders.
·        
It is not OK
to encourage or protect these mental disorders as “civil rights.”
This declaration is meant as a “warning shot” to the silent,
craven conservative media class.  They
must now stand up to the LGBT Agenda and defend natural marriage and family as
strongly as they defend  life, the Second
Amendment, and other natural rights.  We
invite every major media pundit on the right to take up our challenge.  If they refuse, they must then admit that
they are not true conservatives.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x