This judicial tyranny from the Supreme Court of Taiwan
affirms that this is the only means by which LGBT agitators can
force their perverted vision of "marriage equality" onto this or any
other country. For the last fie years, the homosexual-transgender lobby
has long understood that the only way to ensure the passage and accept of
"gay marriage" would have to go through the judicial system. The
arbitrary arrogance of supreme courts has overruled the will of people and
natural law countless times, and has become the final means of imposing this
unnatural, immoral travesty on individuals.
affirms that this is the only means by which LGBT agitators can
force their perverted vision of "marriage equality" onto this or any
other country. For the last fie years, the homosexual-transgender lobby
has long understood that the only way to ensure the passage and accept of
"gay marriage" would have to go through the judicial system. The
arbitrary arrogance of supreme courts has overruled the will of people and
natural law countless times, and has become the final means of imposing this
unnatural, immoral travesty on individuals.
For two decades, LGBT forces in the United
States relied on the ballot box and the initiative process to impose a radical,
unacceptable redefinition of marriage. Even in liberal California, the
majority of voters rejected gay marriage and enshrined the natural, proper
definition of marriage through a 2008 initiative vote. When those efforts
failed, they launched federal lawsuits to undermine the will of the voters and
the well-being of the community. One lawsuit filed against California's
pro-family initiative Prop 8 ended up throwing out Prop 8 on procedural
grounds.
States relied on the ballot box and the initiative process to impose a radical,
unacceptable redefinition of marriage. Even in liberal California, the
majority of voters rejected gay marriage and enshrined the natural, proper
definition of marriage through a 2008 initiative vote. When those efforts
failed, they launched federal lawsuits to undermine the will of the voters and
the well-being of the community. One lawsuit filed against California's
pro-family initiative Prop 8 ended up throwing out Prop 8 on procedural
grounds.
![]("https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Vtci_zINXTw/WSY3GmNXgeI/AAAAAAAAaLQ/0WerG4Py1-QS8WWVohJ_9woOsMD91c4ewCLcB/s1600/California%2BMassResistance%2BLogo.png")
The disastrous United States Supreme Court
decision Obergefell v.
Hodges in 2015 affirmed
that judicial bullying based on political correctness, distorted
renderings of the United States Constitution and the fundamental definition of
liberty would carry the day. Now this horrid reality has inflicted the
Taiwanese government.
decision Obergefell v.
Hodges in 2015 affirmed
that judicial bullying based on political correctness, distorted
renderings of the United States Constitution and the fundamental definition of
liberty would carry the day. Now this horrid reality has inflicted the
Taiwanese government.
Both natural affection and moral
recognition throughout human history proves that marriage is an
institution defined by one man and one woman. Children understand the need
for a mother and a father, and societies as a whole thrive based on the
necessary institution of family. Numerous studies in sociology, epidemiology,
and psychology have affirmed the importance of natural marriage and the nuclear
family. This matter is too great, and abuse by judicial authorities, is too
great for pro-family activists to ignore. It's time for pro-family forces
to ensure judicial restraint or if necessary, civil disobedience to uncivil a
cultural shift as "gay marriage". The threats to life and liberty
will only grow worse for the Taiwanese people following this disastrous
decision.
recognition throughout human history proves that marriage is an
institution defined by one man and one woman. Children understand the need
for a mother and a father, and societies as a whole thrive based on the
necessary institution of family. Numerous studies in sociology, epidemiology,
and psychology have affirmed the importance of natural marriage and the nuclear
family. This matter is too great, and abuse by judicial authorities, is too
great for pro-family activists to ignore. It's time for pro-family forces
to ensure judicial restraint or if necessary, civil disobedience to uncivil a
cultural shift as "gay marriage". The threats to life and liberty
will only grow worse for the Taiwanese people following this disastrous
decision.