California MassResistance: Full-Court Press Against SB1146 During July Recess

California is embracing the perverse LGBT agenda almost as quickly
as Massachusetts already has. The infamous openly gay (and pedophile) Harvey
Milk has his own state holiday. Major cities have their own homosexual “pride”
parades.

There are glimmers of hope, although not very strong. LGBT
pageantries have begun dying down in San Francisco, a city where only the most
well-to-do can afford to live, in the midst of overwhelming squalor. West
Hollywood, considered a gay “mecca” for decades, discussed removing the
six-colored rainbow flag from city hall. Los Angeles is reeling from crime and
corruption on an unprecedented scale, and pro-gay forces are in conflict about
how to celebrate their “pride”.

Nevertheless, the attacks on the family have taken on an
unprecedented surge. The California Republican Party allowed the pro-gay Log
Cabin Republicans to become a chartered group, even though party by-laws forbid
chartering groups with values in conflict with the state party platform.

Before Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker signed
legislation to allow men into women’s bathrooms, the California state
legislature had signed off on similar legislation, which would allow “transgender”
students in public schools to use student restrooms and locker rooms rather
than having to change in a separate room entirely.

Pro-family groups throughout the state fought hard to
overturn this law through initiative, but fell short—twice—to collect the
necessary signatures.

The state superintendent has also signed off on forcing
students as early as second grade to learn about the key figures in LGBT
history.

I kid you not. There is nothing gay about this agenda.

And now, the latest iteration of these perverse policies is manifesting
behind SB 1146.

This legislation would effectively shut down Christian
higher education in the state. Christian colleges would have to scale back the
exemptions they claim to specific religious training only. The schools would
also be reuired to inform prospective students that they claim the Title IX
exemptions.

The legislation has been amended and changed numerous times,
but the concerns about it have not gone away.

Barry
Corey, the president of Biola University, one of the oldest Christian
colleges in the state of California, has issued his latest concerns about this
legislation: “We don’t them want to change who were are.”

This approach is not the strongest. It does not attack the
core issues relating to this agenda, that so much of it is predicated on lies
and distortions, chief of which is that homosexual behavior and transgenderism are
not civil rights, and therefore do not fall within the confines of Title IX in
the first place.

In spite of the tepid response from most establishment
pro-family groups, California MassResistance is taking on a more direct,
confrontational approach.

On June 29^th, a few days before the state
legislature adjourned for summer recess, our team stormed and protested in
front of the bill’s sponsor, the openly gay and hostile State Senator Ricardo
Lara. Staffers were supposed to meet with five members of our team, but they
never showed up.

On the same day, the California state assembly’s judiciary
committee conducted a sham hearing on the bill, and passed it out to the
Appropriations committee, which will review the legislation during the first
week of August.

After the judiciary committee hearing, California MassResistance
members knew that they had their work cut out for them.

Immediately, call sheets were sent out to pro-family groups
to contact all members of the Assembly appropriations committee.

From there, our team planned specific visits to confront
specific lawmakers, and hold them accountable to vote against this terrible
bill.

Our team visited both Republicans as well as Democrats.

Here,
they visited the office of Assemblyman David Hadley (R-Torrance).

Here
is our first video at the event.

Here,
we spelled out our concerns more concretely to Hadley’s staffers.

Evan Chase and Tracy Hopkins also shared
their clear convictions against SB 1146. And other
video here.

The staffer, Sara Wiltfong, offered no clear answer whether
Hadley would vote for or against the bill. This lack of certitude was very
disconcerting.

Two Democratic assemblymembers, Patti Lopez and Jimmy Gomez,
despite the state party’s radical left-wing leanings, have announced that they
will vote against SB 1146.

The next day, California MassResistance paid a visit to a
public event hosted by
the Assembly minority leader Chad Mayes (R-Yucca Valley, Yucaipa).
Coincidentally enough, concerns about SB1146 were weighing on many residents’
minds at the event. Mayes indicated that he did not know a lot about the bill.
That was very disturbing news to hear. We expected him to signal emphatic opposition
to the bill. Here are his
remarks to the group meeting.

The next week, California MassResistance planned a more
extensive lobbying effort, targeting not just members of the Appropriations
Committee, but individuals in swing districts or tight races.

Friday July 22.

The first group spoke with representatives of assemblyman
Chris Holden. He has normally voted more liberal on key issues, but
constituents have also noted that he attends a local church, and faces a challenger
for his seat.

California MassResistance announced their concerns about SB
1146 and urged a No Vote:

Another group headed to Assembly Miguel Santiago’s office in
Los Angeles. He had cancelled the meeting with constituents the night before!

Shame on him! He faces a strong challenger who is taking no
special interest money!

California MassResistance does not rely on persuasion. Most lawmakers
must feel the heat to see the light. Our team is committed to making it very
clear to legislators: Vote No on SB 1146 or we will throw you out of office!

Three
other teams went to the offices of:

1. Majority Leader Ian Calderon

2. Assemblyman Tom Daly

3. Assemblyman Patrick O’Donnell

Two members were interested in visiting Calderon’s office,
but nothing came of it.

Two members of the team spoke with Daly’s staff in Anaheim:

The
greatest demonstration occurred at Assemblyman O’Donnell’s office, where at
least fifty people arrived in front of the building, and five of us went in to
speak with O’Donnell’s Communications Director.

For the next thirty minutes, parents and grandparents from
Christian college alumni explained their opposition to SB 1146. We had another
person in the lobby join our discussion. Pastor Jerry Reub of Cornerstone
Church explained how churches and Christian schools were offering services to
the community, while Senator Ricardo Lara was only interested in limiting their
freedom of speech and outreach.

Check out videos of our protest here,
here,
and here.

Here are some key photos from our meeting with O’Donnell and
his staff:

The
turnout was impressive, once again exceeding my expectations.

Reporters from local radio stations also
interviewed us!

Two other news outlets interview me in connection with
California MassResistance: NBC News (digital) and CalWatchdog. Check
out the Calwatchdog article here.

City Councils take
lead to protest SB 1146

Locally elected officials in California are also sounding
the alarm about this terrible bill, and one of those cities is located in
Senator Lara’s own district!

Cudahy city councilman Jack Guerrero submitted a discussion
item to the July 25^th Cudahy City Council agenda. He gave a
passionate defense of the First Amendment and religious liberty, but neither of
his remaining couples would even second his motion.

Terrible, but activists in the city supported Guerrero’s
fight for the First Amendment:

Here is the video sequence in
which Guerrero explains his reasons for opposing SB 1146.

The next day, I visited La Mirada, the
home of Biola University.

The city council has drafted a letter in opposition
to SB 1146, which they have forwarded to Senator Ricardo Lara.

The councilman who has been most active on
this issue, Andrew Sarega, sat with me and shared more specific concerns about
the bill and why religious freedom must be protected at all costs.

Listen to his remarks here.

Final Reflection

Our work is cut
out for us, but the momentum against this legislation is gaining.