Boston Globe: Run, Warren, Run!

Chicago native, former Saul Alinsky acolyte, First Lady, US
Senator, Presidential Candidate, and Secretary of State Hilary Clinton is the
inevitable Democratic nominee for President, again.

Hillary Clinton (Truth Revolt)

Democratic leaders in California are already launching
“Ready for Hillary” fundraisers. Local activists tout Clinton’s margins of
victory in hypothetical match-ups against all known potential Republican
contenders, gleefully anticipating another four to eight years of the
Democratic Party holding the White House (although likely facing a Republican
held Congress).

Democrats are singing: “We’re gonna party like it’s 1992!”.
Hoping for another Bush (Jeb) v. Clinton (Hillary) contest, Democrats hope that
the former First Lady of the first “Black” President will become the First Lady
President in US History. After pulling the lever for the first Black President,
and the black eye this country has suffered continuously on account f it,
progressive statists and illiberal Democrats want to roll the identity politics
dice a second time, and hope that a Woman President will make it all better.
Why not go all the way and select a gay, handicapped, elderly Hispanic, and
check all the left-wing boxes at once?

Clinton Faces Email-Gate (The ConservativeTreeHouse.wordpress.com)

She had one private account because she did not want the
inconvenience of two, yet two weeks prior she admitted in a friendly forum her
ownership of two cellphone devices, with their own servers, no doubt. If her
technology skills are so lacking, is she competent enough for the White House?
What record does she have to run on? A first lady who helped wipe out
Democratic majorities in Congress following the heedless pursuit of
single-payer HillaryCare? Her middling, unknown term in the US Senate is known
for voting for the War in Iraq, which brought down her 2008 Presidential bid. And
then there’s the eight years of Barack Obama which Hillary Clinton will have to
explain, ignore, or run away from.

Hillary Clinton’s time is running out, and Democratic
partisans want someone else, and fast. Already, the progressive wing of the
Democratic Party is the head, the heart and soul of the political organization:
wiped out in Washington and disappearing across the country (except in
bankrupted municipalities governed by public sector unions, welfare recipients,
and illegal aliens). Iowa Democrats admitted their yearn for someone more
liberal.

Another name has been making the background ranks, complete
with MoveOn.org living room meet and greets, emails, letters, and online
petitions:

From a purely political perspective, Warren is one of few Democrats
to win election in the last four years. Warren has harnessed the populist Left
with uncompromising zeal, railing against Big Business and Big Banks, yet
loving Big Labor and pushing for Big Government. She is everything a progressive
activist would want. She voted against the last-minute CRomnibus bill. She
pulled together a list of Progressive Commandments. She attracts the attention
of Left and Right, with pure ideology floating her viability. Plus she is a
woman, which would appease the yearning guilt of the Democratic Party itching
to elect the First Woman President.

More Democrats should
join the chorus for Warren as 2016 Democratic nominee, the true representative
of the Democratic Party.

Republicans should
hope for a Warren candidacy, and expose the new Democratic Party, hypocritical to
its roots, populist face with an elitist spirit, playing up class warfare while
creating it, shrouded in the blind faith of Obama’s “Hope and Change”
fanaticism. A strong, Republican candidate would shut out the Dems’ 21^ST
century version of Walter Mondale. Instead of 1992, Republicans will party like
it’s 1984, just as conservative icon Ronald Reagan swept nearly every state in
the union.

Run, Warren, Run!

Run, Liz, Run! (Truth Revolt)