Corrupt Claremont Lieutenant Bennett's Costly, Bitter Divorce

It looks like Officer Bennett has serious family troubles, too?

Well, well, well.

Is this why he harasses everybody?

More words out there … this guy is corrupt!

More to follow:

FAMVS1102019 – KARLAN BENNETT-V-KIMBERLY BENNETT
Action:

MICHAEL BISHAY, COMMISSIONER
CLERK: EILEEN CHRISTIANSEN
COURT REPORTER WENDY LUCERO 11855
BAILIFF: P BUSH
–
APPEARANCES:
PETITIONER KARLAN BENNETT PRESENT
KIMBERLY BENNETT APPEARS BY COURTCALL.
–
PROCEEDINGS:
OSC/MOTION HELD.

WITNESS — KARLAN BENNETT IS SWORN AND EXAMINED.

WITNESS — KIMBERLY BENNETT TELEPHONICLY IS SWORN AND EXAMINED.

WRITTEN REPORT RECEIVED FROM FAMILY COURT SERVICES PARTIAL AGREEMENT.

AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REPORT OF CHILD CUSTODY RECOMMENDING COUNSELOR IS READ AND CONSIDERED BY THE COURT.
–
–
THE COURT FINDS IT HAS JURISDICTION TO MAKE ORDERS REGARDING CHILD CUSTODY UNDER THE UNIFORM CHILD CUSTODY JURISDICTION AND ENFORCEMENT ACT.

"I hate my wife, but I will take it out on law-abiding citizens!"

CUSTODY AND VISITATION ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

PURSUANT TO FAMILY CODE SECTION 3048, THE COURT HAS JURISDICTION TO MAKE ORDERS REGARDING CUSTODY UNDER THE FAMILY CODE AND THE UNIFORM CHILD CUSTODY JURISDICTION AND ENFORCEMENT ACT.

NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD WAS GIVEN TO THE PARTIES/RESPONDING PARTY AS PROVIDED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

THE COUNTRY OF HABITUAL RESIDENCE OF THE CHILD/CHILDREN IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
THE COURT HAS CONSIDERED THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN FAMILY CODE 3048(B)(1) AND FINDS THAT THERE IS NOT A RISK OF ABDUCTION OF THE CHILD BY EITHER PARTY.

A VIOLATION OF THIS CUSTODY ORDER MAY SUBJECT A PARTY FOUND IN VIOLATION TO CIVIL OR CRIMINAL PENALTIES, OR BOTH.

"I am working overtime to pay off child support. It's ALL YOUR FAULT!"

COURT MAKES ORDERS PURSUANT TO CHILD CUSTODY RECOMMENDING COUNSELING REPORT AS ATTACHED AND ORDERED INCORPORATED INTO THE MINUTE ORDER.

PARTIAL AGREEMENT ADOPTED AS MODIFIED BY STIPULATED AGREEMENT AS ORDER OF COURT
–
THE RECOMMENDATIONS ARE ADOPTED AS ORDER OF THE COURT AS MODIFIED
PETITIONER TO PREPARE ORDER AFTER HEARING.
ACTION – COMPLETE