This is nothing short of a miracle.
allowed to serve on state and local boards and commissions, despite recent
efforts to further integrate those living in California illegally into civic
life.
This issue should have never been considered, let alone voted upon in any legislature.
One cannot imagine what would have happened should this bill had been signed into law.
would have authorized the appointment of any California resident over the age
of 18 to a civil office, regardless of immigration or citizenship status.
Disgusting.
Now check out what Brown wrote in rejection of this terrible law:
these forms of public service — is the better path,” Brown wrote in his veto
message.
SB 174, said the citizenship requirement for state posts originated with anti-Chinese
immigrant discrimination in the 19th century and eliminating it would allow the
state to better serve its diverse communities.
BULL–SH*T!
I am sickened how the Brown Supremacy movement taking the plights of other ethnic groups to justify their lawlessness.
Chinese migrants in the United States did not break into the country.
Mateo, a 33-year-old attorney and immigrant rights activist who came to the
United States from Mexico illegally with her family as a teenager, to an
advisory committee that aims to increase college access for low-income and
minority students.
I have informed her of her lawlessness:
@LizbethMateo Did you read what @JerryBrownGov wrote when he vetoed #SB174?"I believe existing law–which requires citizenship for these forms of public service–is the better path."
Mateo, step down from #Cal_SOAP and self-deport.@calicrusader @tchuy03 @FAIRImmigration pic.twitter.com/Bba3vyjgbW
— Arthur C. Schaper (@ArthurCSchaper) September 30, 2018
Lara said the veto is short-sighted. “If people have earned
the opportunity to serve through their experience and talents, we should invite
them to the table,” the statement said. “There was a time when Chinese
Americans, Japanese Americans, African Americans, and Catholics were prevented
from serving, and California cleared away those barriers. I predict that this
barrier will eventually fall.”
Ricardo Lara's hateful disregard for citizenship was worse than short-sighted. It was criminal and unconstitutional.
have prohibited the civil arrest, inside a courthouse, of someone attending a
court proceeding or with legal business before the court.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents from targeting immigrants for
arrest at California courthouses.
Brown commented:
concerned that it may have unintended consequences,” Brown wrote in his veto
message. He referenced the “sanctuary state” law, passed last year, which
tasked the California attorney general with developing guidelines for limiting
cooperation with federal immigration authorities at courthouses and other
public facilities.
be released before enacting new laws in this area,” Brown wrote.
Prudent path? Really. All this talk about "paths" is really interesting. All of a sudden, Jerry Brown is not rebelling against the federal government. How does anyone of us explain this change of heart?
Final Reflection
So, why did Governor Brown do the unthinkable and do the right thing?
Here are a few ideas:
of the non-stop fires. Any more poking in the federal eyes could have
jeopardized lots of concerns.
raids and more deportations (which I am OK with)
have already lost millions in federal grants. This would have made it much
worse.
signature.